[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+n+GSvOiLkMHGE6ExeOkYLDs4Sy4BR-yopZrw3Z1yv1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 19:58:36 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: disambiguate the TSO and GSO limits
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 7:51 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This series separates the device-reported TSO limitations
> from the user space-controlled GSO limits. It used to be that
> we only had the former (HW limits) but they were named GSO.
> This probably lead to confusion and letting user override them.
>
> The problem came up in the BIG TCP discussion between Eric and
> Alex, and seems like something we should address.
>
> Targeting net-next because (a) nobody is reporting problems;
> and (b) there is a tiny but non-zero chance that some actually
> wants to lift the HW limitations.
>
> Jakub Kicinski (4):
> net: add netif_inherit_tso_max()
> net: don't allow user space to lift the device limits
> net: make drivers set the TSO limit not the GSO limit
> net: move netif_set_gso_max helpers
>
Very nice, thanks Jakub.
BIT TCP patch series looks much nicer after this series, I will post
v3 when your series is merged.
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists