[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220509183024.0edd698f@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 18:30:24 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: warn if transport header was not set
On Mon, 9 May 2022 16:52:17 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eric-Dumazet/net-CONFIG_DEBUG_NET-and-friends/20220510-031145
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git 9c095bd0d4c451d31d0fd1131cc09d3b60de815d
> > config: arm-oxnas_v6_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220510/202205100723.9Wqso3nI-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/d316b61f313a417d7dfa97fa006320288f3af150
> > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Eric-Dumazet/net-CONFIG_DEBUG_NET-and-friends/20220510-031145
> > git checkout d316b61f313a417d7dfa97fa006320288f3af150
> > # save the config file
> > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.3.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/ drivers/net/mdio/ net/core/
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >
>
> I suppose some compiler/arches are asking us to add forward
> declaration for struct net_device.
> I have no idea what is the justification for that.
Yeah the order of inclusion is skbuff -> netdevice, as you probably
figured out by yourself. We may want to pull back the code move for
the print helpers. Unless you have cycles to untangle that :S
Powered by blists - more mailing lists