netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: warn if transport header was not set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iK6ydh4JctuYN3DCpMxp+5NhbSVV2=CA50MLOJYJH6HFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 May 2022 19:11:15 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: warn if transport header was not set

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah the order of inclusion is skbuff -> netdevice, as you probably
> figured out by yourself. We may want to pull back the code move for
> the print helpers. Unless you have cycles to untangle that :S

I added at the beginning of the new file :

#include <linux/bug.h>
struct net_device;

Hopefully this is enough.