netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 11:26:16 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        Andre Edich <andre.edich@...rochip.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>,
        Gabriel Hojda <ghojda@...urs.ro>,
        Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts
 to PHY driver to avoid polling

Hi Jakub,

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 11:32:07AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2022 15:15:05 +0200 Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > @@ -608,11 +618,20 @@ static void smsc95xx_status(struct usbnet *dev, struct urb *urb)
> >  	intdata = get_unaligned_le32(urb->transfer_buffer);
> >  	netif_dbg(dev, link, dev->net, "intdata: 0x%08X\n", intdata);
> >  
> > +	/* USB interrupts are received in softirq (tasklet) context.
> > +	 * Switch to hardirq context to make genirq code happy.
> > +	 */
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> > +	__irq_enter_raw();
> > +
> >  	if (intdata & INT_ENP_PHY_INT_)
> > -		;
> > +		generic_handle_domain_irq(pdata->irqdomain, PHY_HWIRQ);
> >  	else
> >  		netdev_warn(dev->net, "unexpected interrupt, intdata=0x%08X\n",
> >  			    intdata);
> > +
> > +	__irq_exit_raw();
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> 
> IRQ maintainers could you cast your eyes over this?

Thomas applied 792ea6a074ae ("genirq: Remove WARN_ON_ONCE() in
generic_handle_domain_irq()") tonight:

http://git.kernel.org/tip/tip/c/792ea6a074ae

That allows me to drop the controversial __irq_enter_raw().

Jakub, do you want me to resend the full series (all 7 patches)
or should I send only patch [5/7] in-reply-to this one here?
Or do you prefer applying all patches except [5/7] and have me
resend that single patch?

Let me know what your preferred modus operandi is.

Thanks,

Lukas