netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220511091514.11601299@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 09:15:14 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        Andre Edich <andre.edich@...rochip.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>,
        Gabriel Hojda <ghojda@...urs.ro>,
        Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@...glemail.com>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY
 interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling

On Wed, 11 May 2022 11:26:16 +0200 Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > IRQ maintainers could you cast your eyes over this?  
> 
> Thomas applied 792ea6a074ae ("genirq: Remove WARN_ON_ONCE() in
> generic_handle_domain_irq()") tonight:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/tip/tip/c/792ea6a074ae

Perfect!

> That allows me to drop the controversial __irq_enter_raw().
> 
> Jakub, do you want me to resend the full series (all 7 patches)
> or should I send only patch [5/7] in-reply-to this one here?
> Or do you prefer applying all patches except [5/7] and have me
> resend that single patch?
> 
> Let me know what your preferred modus operandi is.

Resending all patches would be the easiest for us and has the lowest
chance of screw up on our side, so resend all please & thanks!