lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 15:27:40 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
        Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: enetc: count the tc-taprio window
 drops

On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:36:15 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
> 
> The enetc scheduler for IEEE 802.1Qbv has 2 options (depending on
> PTGCR[TG_DROP_DISABLE]) when we attempt to send an oversized packet
> which will never fit in its allotted time slot for its traffic class:
> either block the entire port due to head-of-line blocking, or drop the
> packet and set a bit in the writeback format of the transmit buffer
> descriptor, allowing other packets to be sent.
> 
> We obviously choose the second option in the driver, but we do not
> detect the drop condition, so from the perspective of the network stack,
> the packet is sent and no error counter is incremented.
> 
> This change checks the writeback of the TX BD when tc-taprio is enabled,
> and increments a specific ethtool statistics counter and a generic
> "tx_dropped" counter in ndo_get_stats64.

Is there no MIB attribute in the standard for such drops?

The semantics seem petty implementation-independent can we put it into
some structured ethtool stats instead?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ