[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220512121249.GB4703@wunner.de>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 14:12:49 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't reset PHY behind
PHY driver's back
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:42:03AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> smsc95xx_reset() resets the PHY behind the PHY driver's back, which
> seems like a bad idea generally. Remove that portion of the function.
>
> We're about to use PHY interrupts instead of polling to detect link
> changes on SMSC LAN95xx chips. Because smsc95xx_reset() is called from
> usbnet_open(), PHY interrupt settings are lost whenever the net_device
> is brought up.
>
> There are two other callers of smsc95xx_reset(), namely smsc95xx_bind()
> and smsc95xx_reset_resume(), and both may indeed benefit from a PHY
> reset. However they already perform one through their calls to
> phy_connect_direct() and phy_init_hw().
>
> Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> # LAN9514/9512/9500
> Tested-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com> # LAN9514
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> Cc: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>
> Cc: Gabriel Hojda <ghojda@...urs.ro>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew kindly provided this tag here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/YnGq401sOeC0zwt6@lunn.ch/
Forgot to add it to the commit.
Sending it in separately so patchwork picks it up.
My apologies for the inconvenience.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists