[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6af0b0fe-daf3-5310-2f13-e411a80bdde8@nfschina.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:04:30 +0800
From: liqiong <liqiong@...china.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hukun@...china.com, qixu@...china.com, yuzhe@...china.com,
renyu@...china.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/bpf: change "char *" string form to "char []"
在 2022年05月13日 04:59, Daniel Borkmann 写道:
> On 5/12/22 7:08 PM, liqiong wrote:
>> 在 2022年05月12日 23:16, Yonghong Song 写道:
>>>
>>> On 5/12/22 7:28 AM, liqiong wrote:
>>>> The string form of "char []" declares a single variable. It is better
>>>> than "char *" which creates two variables.
>>>
>>> Could you explain in details about why it is better in generated codes?
>>> It is not clear to me why your patch is better than the original code.
>>
>> The string form of "char *" creates two variables in the final assembly output,
>> a static string, and a char pointer to the static string. Use "objdump -S -D *.o",
>> can find out the static string occurring at "Contents of section .rodata".
>
> There are ~360 instances of this type in the tree from a quick grep, do you
> plan to convert all them ?
Hi daniel,
I have fixed all the string form in kernel tree, summited two patches.
Have searched the kernel tree by "grep -nHre char.*\*.*=.*\"", and checked all the "char *foo = "bar" "
string form, only five instances are needed to fix in bpf direcotry (2 files) and trace directory (2 files).
In most cases, need a char pointer anyway, just like this:
[const] char *foo = "bar";
if (xxx)
foo = "blash";
In this situation, can't change "char *foo" to "char foo[]".
This work was published in "KernelJanitors/Todo". So, I fixed.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists