[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220517183935.6863ddc7@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 18:39:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
Sam.Shih@...iatek.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/15] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: rely on
rxd_size field in mtk_rx_alloc/mtk_rx_clean
On Mon, 16 May 2022 18:06:37 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> +
> + rxd = (void *)ring->dma + i * eth->soc->txrx.rxd_size;
> + rxd->rxd1 = (unsigned int)dma_addr;
>
> if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SOC_MT7628))
> - ring->dma[i].rxd2 = RX_DMA_LSO;
> + rxd->rxd2 = RX_DMA_LSO;
> else
> - ring->dma[i].rxd2 = RX_DMA_PLEN0(ring->buf_size);
> + rxd->rxd2 = RX_DMA_PLEN0(ring->buf_size);
> +
> + rxd->rxd3 = 0;
> + rxd->rxd4 = 0;
The clearing of rxd3/rxd4 should probably have been mentioned in the
commit message. It does not seem related to descriptor size.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists