netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 11/15] net: ethernet: mtk_eth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 18:41:22 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org,
        sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        Sam.Shih@...iatek.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 11/15] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: introduce
 device register map

On Mon, 16 May 2022 18:06:38 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>  /* PDMA RX Base Pointer Register */
> -#define MTK_PRX_BASE_PTR0	0x900
> +#define MTK_PRX_BASE_PTR0	(eth->soc->reg_map[MTK_PDMA_BASE] + 0x100)
>  #define MTK_PRX_BASE_PTR_CFG(x)	(MTK_PRX_BASE_PTR0 + (x * 0x10))

Implicit macro arguments are really unpleasant for people doing
tree-wide changes or otherwise unfamiliar with the driver.

Nothing we can do to avoid this?