[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220520175601.630bde21@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 17:56:01 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
roopa@...dia.com, dsahern@...nel.org, qindi@...ff.weibo.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, neigh: introduce interval_probe_time for periodic
probe
On Fri, 20 May 2022 05:51:04 +0000 Yuwei Wang wrote:
> commit 7482e3841d52 ("net, neigh: Add NTF_MANAGED flag for managed neighbor entries")
> neighbor entries which with NTF_EXT_MANAGED flags will periodically call neigh_event_send()
> for performing the resolution. and the interval was set to DELAY_PROBE_TIME
>
> DELAY_PROBE_TIME was configured as the first probe time delay, and it makes sense to set it to `0`.
>
> when DELAY_PROBE_TIME is `0`, the resolution of neighbor entries with NTF_EXT_MANAGED will
> trap in an infinity recursion.
Recursion or will constantly get re-resolved?
> as commit messages mentioned in the above commit, we should introduce a new option which means resolution interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h b/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h
> index 39c565e460c7..5ae538be64b9 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ enum {
> NDTPA_RETRANS_TIME, /* u64, msecs */
> NDTPA_GC_STALETIME, /* u64, msecs */
> NDTPA_DELAY_PROBE_TIME, /* u64, msecs */
> + NDTPA_INTERVAL_PROBE_TIME, /* u64, msecs */
> NDTPA_QUEUE_LEN, /* u32 */
> NDTPA_APP_PROBES, /* u32 */
> NDTPA_UCAST_PROBES, /* u32 */
You can't insert values in the middle of a uAPI enum,
you'll break binary compatibility with older kernels.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists