netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] ixgbe: fix promiscuous mode on VF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 10:57:49 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@...nd.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, intel-wired-lan@...osl.org,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] ixgbe: fix promiscuous mode on VF

On Tue, 24 May 2022 09:37:52 +0200 Olivier Matz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:52:50AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:  
> > > These 2 patches fix issues related to the promiscuous mode on VF.
> > > 
> > > Comments are welcome,
> > > Olivier
> > > 
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> > > 
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - resend with CC intel-wired-lan
> > > - remove CC Hiroshi Shimamoto (address does not exist anymore)
> > > 
> > > Olivier Matz (2):
> > >   ixgbe: fix bcast packets Rx on VF after promisc removal
> > >   ixgbe: fix unexpected VLAN Rx in promisc mode on VF
> > > 
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 8 ++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)  
> > 
> > Any feedback about this patchset?
> > Comments are welcome.  
> 
> I didn't get feedback for this patchset until now. Am I doing things
> correctly? Am I targeting the appropriate mailing lists and people?
> 
> Please let me know if I missed something.

You are doing this correctly.. adding a couple more Intel folks.