lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220526141015.43057-1-piotrx.skajewski@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 May 2022 16:10:15 +0200
From:   Piotr Skajewski <piotrx.skajewski@...el.com>
To:     intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, olivier.matz@...nd.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
        pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, alexandr.lobakin@...el.com,
        maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
        anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/2] ixgbe: fix promiscuous mode on VF

> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:52:50AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > These 2 patches fix issues related to the promiscuous mode on VF.
> > > 
> > > Comments are welcome,
> > > Olivier
> > > 
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> > > 
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - resend with CC intel-wired-lan
> > > - remove CC Hiroshi Shimamoto (address does not exist anymore)
> > > 
> > > Olivier Matz (2):
> > >   ixgbe: fix bcast packets Rx on VF after promisc removal
> > >   ixgbe: fix unexpected VLAN Rx in promisc mode on VF
> > > 
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 8 ++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Any feedback about this patchset?
> > Comments are welcome.
>
> I didn't get feedback for this patchset until now. Am I doing things
> correctly? Am I targeting the appropriate mailing lists and people?
>
> Please let me know if I missed something.

Hi Olivier,

Sorry for the late reply,
We had to analyze it internally and it took us some time.
After reviewing, we decided that the proposed patches could be accepted.

ACK for series.

Thanks,
Piotr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ