netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/2] ixgbe: fix promiscuous mode on VF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 29 May 2022 21:03:57 +0200
From:   Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@...nd.com>
To:     Piotr Skajewski <piotrx.skajewski@...el.com>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
        alexandr.lobakin@...el.com, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
        jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/2] ixgbe: fix promiscuous mode
 on VF

Hi Piotr,

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:10:15PM +0200, Piotr Skajewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:52:50AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > > These 2 patches fix issues related to the promiscuous mode on VF.
> > > > 
> > > > Comments are welcome,
> > > > Olivier
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v1:
> > > > - resend with CC intel-wired-lan
> > > > - remove CC Hiroshi Shimamoto (address does not exist anymore)
> > > > 
> > > > Olivier Matz (2):
> > > >   ixgbe: fix bcast packets Rx on VF after promisc removal
> > > >   ixgbe: fix unexpected VLAN Rx in promisc mode on VF
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 8 ++++----
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Any feedback about this patchset?
> > > Comments are welcome.
> >
> > I didn't get feedback for this patchset until now. Am I doing things
> > correctly? Am I targeting the appropriate mailing lists and people?
> >
> > Please let me know if I missed something.
> 
> Hi Olivier,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply,
> We had to analyze it internally and it took us some time.
> After reviewing, we decided that the proposed patches could be accepted.
> 
> ACK for series.

No problem for the delay.
Thank you!

Olivier