[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJcbDXtQsYNn=j0NzKx3SFSPE1YTwbmtkxkpzmFt-zh9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 11:50:23 +0200
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@...edance.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] bpf: avoid grabbing spin_locks of all cpus when no
free elems
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:42 AM Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist_head *head,
> @@ -130,14 +134,19 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
> orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> while (1) {
> head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
> + if (READ_ONCE(head->is_empty))
> + goto next_cpu;
> raw_spin_lock(&head->lock);
> node = head->first;
> if (node) {
extra bool is unnecessary.
just READ_ONCE(head->first)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists