[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YpiMMr58nuUN9gQE@krava>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 12:08:50 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
"linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] perf tools: Fix prologue generation
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 03:21:06PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:11 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:16:11PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:46:56AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > hi,
> > > > sending change we discussed some time ago [1] to get rid of
> > > > some deprecated functions we use in perf prologue code.
> > > >
> > > > Despite the gloomy discussion I think the final code does
> > > > not look that bad ;-)
> > > >
> > > > This patchset removes following libbpf functions from perf:
> > > > bpf_program__set_prep
> > > > bpf_program__nth_fd
> > > > struct bpf_prog_prep_result
> > >
> > > So, the first patch is already in torvalds/master, I tried applying the
> > > other two patches to my local perf/core, that already is merged with
> > > torvalds/master and:
> > >
> > > [root@...co ~]# perf test 42
> > > 42: BPF filter :
> > > 42.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
> > > 42.2: BPF pinning : FAILED!
> > > 42.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED!
> > > [root@...co ~]#
> > >
> > > I'll push my local perf/core to tmp.perf/core and continue tomorrow.
> >
> > hi,
> > I just rebased my changes on top of your perf/core and it seems to work:
> >
> > [root@...va perf]# ./perf test bpf
> > 40: LLVM search and compile :
> > 40.1: Basic BPF llvm compile : Ok
> > 40.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation : Ok
> > 40.4: Compile source for BPF relocation : Ok
> > 42: BPF filter :
> > 42.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
> > 42.2: BPF pinning : Ok
> > 42.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
> >
> > is it still a problem?
> >
>
> Ok, so I checked with Jakub, net-next will be forwarded to
> linus/master tomorrow or so, so after that bpf-next will get forwarded
> as well and we'll have all those patches of yours. So let's go back to
> plan A: send your perf changes based on bpf-next. Thanks and sorry for
> the extra noise with all the back and forth.
ok, np
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists