[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJq09z4f1DN1b=+QONT7ya5nXVQ6m8ZcMDVemmkduWc9mXSTRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:17:56 -0300
From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
To: Alvin Šipraga <alvin@...s.dk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: dsa: realtek: rtl8365mb: correct the
max number of ports
Em seg., 6 de jun. de 2022 às 10:46, Alvin Šipraga <alvin@...s.dk> escreveu:
>
> From: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>
>
> The maximum number of ports is actually 11, according to two
> observations:
>
> 1. The highest port ID used in the vendor driver is 10. Since port IDs
> are indexed from 0, and since DSA follows the same numbering system,
> this means up to 11 ports are to be presumed.
>
> 2. The registers with port mask fields always amount to a maximum port
> mask of 0x7FF, corresponding to a maximum 11 ports.
> /* valid for all 6-port or less variants */
It makes sense for the family. The 10-ports variants have 0-7 user
ports and ext0,1,2 declared in rtl8367c driver, although no model I
know does use ext2.
Reviewed-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists