[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB8PBH+EVX3iTr7Nu-QFHAom+VnjPLEk0hpWSi0QiyD5u-bKag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 21:28:58 +0800
From: 山竹小 <mangosteen728@...il.com>
To: ast <ast@...nel.org>, daniel <daniel@...earbox.net>,
andrii <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
mangosteen728 <mangosteen728@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf:add function
Add the absolute path to get the executable corresponding tothe task
Signed-off-by: mangosteen728 < mangosteen728@...il.com>
---
Hi
This is my first attempt to submit patch, there are shortcomings
please more but wait.
In security audit often need to get the absolute path to the
executable of the process so I tried to add bpf_get_task_exe_path in
the helpers function to get.
The code currently only submits the implementation of the function and
how is this patch merge possible if I then add the relevant places。
thanks
mangosteen728
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 225806a..797f 850 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -257,6 +257,43 @@
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE,
};
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_task_exe_path, struct task_struct *, task, char *,
buf, u32, sz)
+{
+ struct file *exe_file = NULL;
+ char *p = NULL;
+ long len = 0;
+
+ if (!sz)
+ return 0;
+ exe_file = get_task_exe_file(tsk);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(exe_file))
+ return 0;
+ p = d_path(&exe_file->f_path, buf, sz);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(path)) {
+ len = PTR_ERR(p);
+ } else {
+ len = buf + sz - p;
+ memmove(buf, p, len);
+ }
+ fput(exe_file);
+ return len;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_task_exe_path_proto = {
+ .func = bpf_get_task_exe_path,
+ .gpl_only = false,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
+ .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
+ .arg3_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
+};
+
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists