lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220610180212.110590-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jun 2022 11:02:12 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, maximmi@...dia.com,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, corbet@....net,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] docs: tls: document the TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO

Add missing documentation for the TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO opt-in.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: corbet@....net
CC: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/networking/tls.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
index 8cb2cd4e2a80..be8e10c14b05 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
@@ -214,6 +214,31 @@ of calling send directly after a handshake using gnutls.
 Since it doesn't implement a full record layer, control
 messages are not supported.
 
+Optional optimizations
+----------------------
+
+There are certain condition-specific optimizations the TLS ULP can make,
+if requested. Those optimizations are either not universally beneficial
+or may impact correctness, hence they require an opt-in.
+All options are set per-socket using setsockopt(), and their
+state can be checked using getsockopt() and via socket diag (``ss``).
+
+TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+For device offload only. Allow sendfile() data to be transmitted directly
+to the NIC without making an in-kernel copy. This allows true zero-copy
+behavior when device offload is enabled.
+
+The application must make sure that the data is not modified between being
+submitted and transmission completing. In other words this is mostly
+applicable if the data sent on a socket via sendfile() is read-only.
+
+Modifying the data may result in different versions of the data being used
+for the original TCP transmission and TCP retransmissions. To the receiver
+this will look like TLS records had been tampered with and will result
+in record authentication failures.
+
 Statistics
 ==========
 
-- 
2.36.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ