lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:39:51 +0300
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] docs: tls: document the TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO

On 2022-06-10 21:02, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Add missing documentation for the TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO opt-in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> CC: corbet@....net
> CC: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>   Documentation/networking/tls.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
> index 8cb2cd4e2a80..be8e10c14b05 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
> @@ -214,6 +214,31 @@ of calling send directly after a handshake using gnutls.
>   Since it doesn't implement a full record layer, control
>   messages are not supported.
>   
> +Optional optimizations
> +----------------------
> +
> +There are certain condition-specific optimizations the TLS ULP can make,
> +if requested. Those optimizations are either not universally beneficial
> +or may impact correctness, hence they require an opt-in.
> +All options are set per-socket using setsockopt(), and their
> +state can be checked using getsockopt() and via socket diag (``ss``).
> +
> +TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +For device offload only. Allow sendfile() data to be transmitted directly
> +to the NIC without making an in-kernel copy. This allows true zero-copy
> +behavior when device offload is enabled.
> +
> +The application must make sure that the data is not modified between being
> +submitted and transmission completing. In other words this is mostly
> +applicable if the data sent on a socket via sendfile() is read-only.
> +
> +Modifying the data may result in different versions of the data being used
> +for the original TCP transmission and TCP retransmissions. To the receiver
> +this will look like TLS records had been tampered with and will result
> +in record authentication failures.
> +
>   Statistics
>   ==========
>   

Acked-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ