[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqtClpfUqQ0m+zVi@shredder>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:47:50 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
petrm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/11] mlxsw: Implement dev info and dev flash
for line cards
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 03:11:57PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:03:52AM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 07:40:34PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:13:35AM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 02:33:15PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> >> $ devlink dev flash auxiliary/mlxsw_core.lc.0 file mellanox/fw-AGB-rel-19_2010_1312-022-EVB.mfa2
> >> >
> >> >How is this firmware activated? It is usually done after reload, but I
> >> >don't see reload implementation for the line card devlink instance.
> >>
> >> Currently, only devlink dev reload of the whole mlxsw instance or
> >> unprovision/provision of a line card.
> >
> >OK, please at least mention it in the commit message that adds flashing
> >support.
> >
> >What about implementing reload support as unprovision/provision?
>
> Yes, that can be done eventually. I was thinking about that as well.
This patch should come before the one that adds flashing. Then both the
primary and nested devlink instances maintain the same semantics with
regards to firmware flashing / activation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists