netdev - Re: [PATCH ethtool] sff-8079/8472: Fix missing sff-8472 output in netlink path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220616195746.2a3feb92@p1.luc.cera.cz>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 19:57:46 +0200
From:   Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        Daniel Juarez <djuarezg@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool] sff-8079/8472: Fix missing sff-8472 output in
 netlink path

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:34:15 +0300
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 05:50:09PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> > Commit 5b64c66f58d ("ethtool: Add netlink handler for
> > getmodule  
>  (-m)") provided a netlink variant for getmodule
> > but also introduced a regression as netlink output is different
> > from ioctl output that provides information from A2h page
> > via sff8472_show_all().
> > 
> > To fix this the netlink path should check a presence of A2h page
> > by value of bit 6 in byte 92 of page A0h and if it is set then
> > get A2h page and call sff8472_show_all().
> > 
> > Fixes: 5b64c66f58d ("ethtool: Add netlink handler for getmodule  
>  (-m)")
> > Tested-by: Daniel Juarez <djuarezg@...n.ch>
> > Co-authored-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>  
> 
> With Michal's comment:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> 
> Tested with both netlink and ioctl, but only with SFP modules that lack
> diagnostic information, as I don't have these at hand.

I have tested this with SFP modules with diag info...
(together with kernel fix: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220616160856.3623273-1-ivecera@redhat.com/)

> Michal, note that for ethtool-next we plan to get rid of sfpdiag.c and
> fold it into sfpid.c, so that the latter will be able to handle both
> SFF-8079 and SFF-8472 using the same memory map. We felt that it's too
> big of a change for the main branch.
+1

Ivan