[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220620155641.GA3846@debian>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:56:48 +0200
From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
willemb@...gle.com, imagedong@...cent.com, talalahmad@...gle.com,
kafai@...com, vasily.averin@...ux.dev, luiz.von.dentz@...el.com,
jk@...econstruct.com.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: helper function for skb_shift
Move the len fields manipulation in the skbs to a helper function.
There is a comment specifically requesting this and there are several
other areas in the code displaying the same pattern which can be
refactored.
This improves code readability.
Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 16 +++++++++++++---
net/core/skbuff.c | 13 +++----------
net/ipv4/esp4.c | 4 +---
net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 8 ++------
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index a01d6c421aa2..21122a22f624 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2218,6 +2218,18 @@ static inline int skb_add_data_nocache(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
return err;
}
+/**
+ * skb_update_len - Updates len fields of skb
+ * @skb: buffer to add len to
+ * @len: number of bytes to add
+ */
+static inline void skb_update_len(struct sk_buff *skb, int len)
+{
+ skb->len += len;
+ skb->data_len += len;
+ skb->truesize += len;
+}
+
static inline int skb_copy_to_page_nocache(struct sock *sk, struct iov_iter *from,
struct sk_buff *skb,
struct page *page,
@@ -2230,9 +2242,7 @@ static inline int skb_copy_to_page_nocache(struct sock *sk, struct iov_iter *fro
if (err)
return err;
- skb->len += copy;
- skb->data_len += copy;
- skb->truesize += copy;
+ skb_update_len(skb, copy);
sk_wmem_queued_add(sk, copy);
sk_mem_charge(sk, copy);
return 0;
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 30b523fa4ad2..e6b5dd69b78f 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3195,9 +3195,7 @@ skb_zerocopy(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from, int len, int hlen)
}
}
- to->truesize += len + plen;
- to->len += len + plen;
- to->data_len += len + plen;
+ skb_update_len(to, len + plen);
if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags(from, GFP_ATOMIC))) {
skb_tx_error(from);
@@ -3634,13 +3632,8 @@ int skb_shift(struct sk_buff *tgt, struct sk_buff *skb, int shiftlen)
tgt->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
- /* Yak, is it really working this way? Some helper please? */
- skb->len -= shiftlen;
- skb->data_len -= shiftlen;
- skb->truesize -= shiftlen;
- tgt->len += shiftlen;
- tgt->data_len += shiftlen;
- tgt->truesize += shiftlen;
+ skb_update_len(skb, -shiftlen);
+ skb_update_len(tgt, shiftlen);
return shiftlen;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index d747166bb291..6d4194349108 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -502,9 +502,7 @@ int esp_output_head(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *
nfrags++;
- skb->len += tailen;
- skb->data_len += tailen;
- skb->truesize += tailen;
+ skb_update_len(skb, tailen);
if (sk && sk_fullsock(sk))
refcount_add(tailen, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 00b4bf26fd93..2c46ecc495a4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -1214,9 +1214,7 @@ static int __ip_append_data(struct sock *sk,
pfrag->offset += copy;
skb_frag_size_add(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i - 1], copy);
- skb->len += copy;
- skb->data_len += copy;
- skb->truesize += copy;
+ skb_update_len(skb, copy);
wmem_alloc_delta += copy;
} else {
err = skb_zerocopy_iter_dgram(skb, from, copy);
@@ -1443,9 +1441,7 @@ ssize_t ip_append_page(struct sock *sk, struct flowi4 *fl4, struct page *page,
skb->csum = csum_block_add(skb->csum, csum, skb->len);
}
- skb->len += len;
- skb->data_len += len;
- skb->truesize += len;
+ skb_update_len(skb, len);
refcount_add(len, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
offset += len;
size -= len;
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists