netdev - Re: [RFC net-next v3 05/29] net: bvec specific path in zerocopy_sg_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee35a179-e9a1-39c7-d054-40b10ca9a1f3@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jul 2022 20:28:06 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v3 05/29] net: bvec specific path in
 zerocopy_sg_from_iter

On 7/4/22 7:31 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> If the series is going to be picked up for 5.20, how about we delay
> this one for 5.21? I'll have time to think about it (maybe moving
> the skb managed flag setup inside?), and will anyway need to send
> some omitted patches then.
> 

I think it reads better for io_uring and future extensions for io_uring
to contain the optimized bvec iter handler and setting the managed flag.
Too many disjointed assumptions the way the code is now. By pulling that
into io_uring, core code does not make assumptions that "managed" means
bvec and no page references - rather that is embedded in the code that
cares.