[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220707171726.5759eb5c@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 17:17:26 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/15] net/tls: Multi-threaded calls to TX
tls_dev_del
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 01:14:32 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > Why don't we need the flush any more? The module reference is gone as
> > soon as destructor runs (i.e. on ULP cleanup), the work can still be
> > pending, no?
>
> So this garbage collector work does not exist anymore. Replaced by
> per-context works, with no accessibility to them from this function.
> It seems that we need to guarantee completion of these works. Maybe by
> queuing them to a new dedicated queue, flushing it here.
Yup, SG.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists