lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220707171726.5759eb5c@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jul 2022 17:17:26 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/15] net/tls: Multi-threaded calls to TX
 tls_dev_del

On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 01:14:32 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > Why don't we need the flush any more? The module reference is gone as
> > soon as destructor runs (i.e. on ULP cleanup), the work can still be
> > pending, no?  
> 
> So this garbage collector work does not exist anymore. Replaced by 
> per-context works, with no accessibility to them from this function.
> It seems that we need to guarantee completion of these works. Maybe by 
> queuing them to a new dedicated queue, flushing it here.

Yup, SG.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ