[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ys0pNQWAJneX1gQ8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:56:37 +0100
From: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
Cc: ecree.xilinx@...il.com, sshah@...arflare.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Yanghang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] sfc: fix use after free when disabling sriov
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 08:26:42AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> Use after free is detected by kfence when disabling sriov. What was read
> after being freed was vf->pci_dev: it was freed from pci_disable_sriov
> and later read in efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vports, called from
> efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching.
>
> Set the pointer to NULL at release time to not trying to read it later.
This solution just bypasses the check we have in
efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vports():
/* If VF is assigned, do not free the vport */
if (vf->pci_dev && pci_is_dev_assigned(vf->pci_dev))
continue;
If we don't want to detect this any more we should remove this
check in stead of this patch.
There is another issue here, in efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching()
we do free the memory even if a VF was still assigned. This leads me
to think that removing the check above is the better thing to do.
Martin
> Reproducer and dmesg log (note that kfence doesn't detect it every time):
> $ echo 1 > /sys/class/net/enp65s0f0np0/device/sriov_numvfs
> $ echo 0 > /sys/class/net/enp65s0f0np0/device/sriov_numvfs
>
> BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching+0x82/0x170 [sfc]
>
> Use-after-free read at 0x00000000ff3c1ba5 (in kfence-#224):
> efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching+0x82/0x170 [sfc]
> efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable+0x38/0x70 [sfc]
> efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc]
> sriov_numvfs_store+0xfe/0x140
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0
> new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0
> vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280
> ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
> do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> kfence-#224: 0x00000000edb8ef95-0x00000000671f5ce1, size=2792, cache=kmalloc-4k
>
> allocated by task 6771 on cpu 10 at 3137.860196s:
> pci_alloc_dev+0x21/0x60
> pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2a2/0x320
> sriov_enable+0x212/0x3e0
> efx_ef10_sriov_configure+0x67/0x80 [sfc]
> efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc]
> sriov_numvfs_store+0xba/0x140
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0
> new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0
> vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280
> ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
> do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> freed by task 6771 on cpu 12 at 3170.991309s:
> device_release+0x34/0x90
> kobject_cleanup+0x3a/0x130
> pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xd9/0x120
> sriov_disable+0x30/0xe0
> efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable+0x57/0x70 [sfc]
> efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc]
> sriov_numvfs_store+0xfe/0x140
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0
> new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0
> vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280
> ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
> do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> Fixes: 3c5eb87605e85 ("sfc: create vports for VFs and assign random MAC addresses")
> Reported-by: Yanghang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
> ---
> v2: add missing Fixes tag
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
> index 7f5aa4a8c451..92550c7e85ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
> @@ -408,8 +408,9 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_enable(struct efx_nic *efx, int num_vfs)
> static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev = efx->pci_dev;
> + struct efx_ef10_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
> unsigned int vfs_assigned = pci_vfs_assigned(dev);
> - int rc = 0;
> + int i, rc = 0;
>
> if (vfs_assigned && !force) {
> netif_info(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "VFs are assigned to guests; "
> @@ -417,10 +418,13 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force)
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> - if (!vfs_assigned)
> + if (!vfs_assigned) {
> + for (i = 0; i < efx->vf_count; i++)
> + nic_data->vf[i].pci_dev = NULL;
> pci_disable_sriov(dev);
> - else
> + } else {
> rc = -EBUSY;
> + }
>
> efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching(efx);
> efx->vf_count = 0;
> --
> 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists