netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/76] wifi: more MLO work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ac3c91120a128f66ca3806294f6a783e0f1131f.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:30:19 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Arend Van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, kvalo@...nel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/76] wifi: more MLO work

On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 10:26 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> 
> Just for my own patch submit process. What is the reason I am seeing the 
> "wifi:" prefix being used with patches on linux-wireless list? Is there 
> other wireless tech used, eg. "bt:" or so?
> 

Well, we had a discussion with Jakub, and he kind of indicated that he'd
like to see a bit more generic prefixes to clarify things.

We've kind of been early adopters to try it out and see what it looks
like, he hasn't pushed it and wanted to have a discussion (e.g. at LPC
or netdevconf) about it first, but it kind of makes sense since not
everyone can know all the different drivers and components.

johannes