lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:51:04 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <>
To:     Johannes Berg <>
Cc:     Arend Van Spriel <>,, Jakub Kicinski <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/76] wifi: more MLO work

Johannes Berg <> writes:

> On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 10:26 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> Just for my own patch submit process. What is the reason I am seeing the 
>> "wifi:" prefix being used with patches on linux-wireless list? Is there 
>> other wireless tech used, eg. "bt:" or so?
> Well, we had a discussion with Jakub, and he kind of indicated that he'd
> like to see a bit more generic prefixes to clarify things.
> We've kind of been early adopters to try it out and see what it looks
> like, he hasn't pushed it and wanted to have a discussion (e.g. at LPC
> or netdevconf) about it first, but it kind of makes sense since not
> everyone can know all the different drivers and components.

I have been supposed to document this in the wiki and announce it
properly, but as usual I was too busy before the vacation to do
anything. And now I'm on vacation and trying to enjoy the 13 C of
"warmth" here in Finland :D


Powered by blists - more mailing lists