lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <715d8f47-d246-6b4a-b22d-82672e8f11d8@novek.ru>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:29:18 +0100
From:   Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
To:     "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Cc:     Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>, Aya Levin <ayal@...dia.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] dpll: add netlink events

On 11.07.2022 10:02, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 9:25 PM
>>
>> From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>
>>
>> Add netlink interface to enable notification of users about
>> events in DPLL framework. Part of this interface should be
>> used by drivers directly, i.e. lock status changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c    |   2 +
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h |   7 ++
>> 3 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>> index dc0330e3687d..387644aa910e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>> @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct dpll_device *dpll_device_alloc(struct dpll_device_ops *ops, int sources_c
>> 	mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> 	dpll->priv = priv;
>>
>> +	dpll_notify_device_create(dpll->id, dev_name(&dpll->dev));
>> +
>> 	return dpll;
>>
>> error:
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> index e15106f30377..4b1684fcf41e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ struct param {
>> 	int dpll_source_type;
>> 	int dpll_output_id;
>> 	int dpll_output_type;
>> +	int dpll_status;
>> +	const char *dpll_name;
>> };
>>
>> struct dpll_dump_ctx {
>> @@ -239,6 +241,8 @@ static int dpll_genl_cmd_set_source(struct param *p)
>> 	ret = dpll->ops->set_source_type(dpll, src_id, type);
>> 	mutex_unlock(&dpll->lock);
>>
>> +	dpll_notify_source_change(dpll->id, src_id, type);
>> +
>> 	return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -262,6 +266,8 @@ static int dpll_genl_cmd_set_output(struct param *p)
>> 	ret = dpll->ops->set_source_type(dpll, out_id, type);
>> 	mutex_unlock(&dpll->lock);
>>
>> +	dpll_notify_source_change(dpll->id, out_id, type);
>> +
>> 	return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -438,6 +444,141 @@ static struct genl_family dpll_gnl_family __ro_after_init = {
>> 	.pre_doit	= dpll_pre_doit,
>> };
>>
>> +static int dpll_event_device_create(struct param *p)
>> +{
>> +	if (nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_ID, p->dpll_id) ||
>> +	    nla_put_string(p->msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_NAME, p->dpll_name))
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dpll_event_device_delete(struct param *p)
>> +{
>> +	if (nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_ID, p->dpll_id))
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dpll_event_status(struct param *p)
>> +{
>> +	if (nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_ID, p->dpll_id) ||
>> +		nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_LOCK_STATUS, p->dpll_status))
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dpll_event_source_change(struct param *p)
>> +{
>> +	if (nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_ID, p->dpll_id) ||
>> +	    nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_SOURCE_ID, p->dpll_source_id) ||
>> +		nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_SOURCE_TYPE, p->dpll_source_type))
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dpll_event_output_change(struct param *p)
>> +{
>> +	if (nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_DEVICE_ID, p->dpll_id) ||
>> +	    nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT_ID, p->dpll_output_id) ||
>> +		nla_put_u32(p->msg, DPLLA_OUTPUT_TYPE, p->dpll_output_type))
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static cb_t event_cb[] = {
>> +	[DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CREATE]	= dpll_event_device_create,
>> +	[DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_DELETE]	= dpll_event_device_delete,
>> +	[DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_LOCKED]	= dpll_event_status,
>> +	[DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_UNLOCKED]	= dpll_event_status,
>> +	[DPLL_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE]	= dpll_event_source_change,
>> +	[DPLL_EVENT_OUTPUT_CHANGE]	= dpll_event_output_change,
>> +};
>> +/*
>> + * Generic netlink DPLL event encoding
>> + */
>> +static int dpll_send_event(enum dpll_genl_event event,
>> +				   struct param *p)
>> +{
>> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
>> +	int ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>> +	void *hdr;
>> +
>> +	msg = genlmsg_new(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!msg)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	p->msg = msg;
>> +
>> +	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, 0, 0, &dpll_gnl_family, 0, event);
>> +	if (!hdr)
>> +		goto out_free_msg;
>> +
>> +	ret = event_cb[event](p);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out_cancel_msg;
>> +
>> +	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>> +
>> +	genlmsg_multicast(&dpll_gnl_family, msg, 0, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> All multicasts are send only for group "1" (DPLL_CONFIG_SOURCE_GROUP_NAME),
> but 4 groups were defined.
>

Yes, you are right! Will update it in the next round.

>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +out_cancel_msg:
>> +	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>> +out_free_msg:
>> +	nlmsg_free(msg);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_device_create(int dpll_id, const char *name)
>> +{
>> +	struct param p = { .dpll_id = dpll_id, .dpll_name = name };
>> +
>> +	return dpll_send_event(DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CREATE, &p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_device_delete(int dpll_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct param p = { .dpll_id = dpll_id };
>> +
>> +	return dpll_send_event(DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_DELETE, &p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_status_locked(int dpll_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct param p = { .dpll_id = dpll_id, .dpll_status = 1 };
>> +
>> +	return dpll_send_event(DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_LOCKED, &p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_status_unlocked(int dpll_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct param p = { .dpll_id = dpll_id, .dpll_status = 0 };
>> +
>> +	return dpll_send_event(DPLL_EVENT_STATUS_UNLOCKED, &p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_source_change(int dpll_id, int source_id, int source_type)
>> +{
>> +	struct param p =  { .dpll_id = dpll_id, .dpll_source_id = source_id,
>> +						.dpll_source_type = source_type };
>> +
>> +	return dpll_send_event(DPLL_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE, &p);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_output_change(int dpll_id, int output_id, int output_type)
>> +{
>> +	struct param p =  { .dpll_id = dpll_id, .dpll_output_id = output_id,
>> +						.dpll_output_type = output_type };
>> +
>> +	return dpll_send_event(DPLL_EVENT_OUTPUT_CHANGE, &p);
>> +}
>> +
>> int __init dpll_netlink_init(void)
>> {
>> 	return genl_register_family(&dpll_gnl_family);
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>> index e2d100f59dd6..0dc81320f982 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>> @@ -3,5 +3,12 @@
>>   *  Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>>   */
>>
>> +int dpll_notify_device_create(int dpll_id, const char *name);
>> +int dpll_notify_device_delete(int dpll_id);
>> +int dpll_notify_status_locked(int dpll_id);
>> +int dpll_notify_status_unlocked(int dpll_id);
>> +int dpll_notify_source_change(int dpll_id, int source_id, int source_type);
>> +int dpll_notify_output_change(int dpll_id, int output_id, int output_type);
> 
> Only dpll_notify_device_create is actually used, rest is not.
> I am getting confused a bit, who should call those "notify" functions?
> It is straightforward for create/delete, dpll subsystem shall do it, but what
> about the rest?
> I would say notifications about status or source/output change shall originate
> in the driver implementing dpll interface, thus they shall be exported and
> defined in the header included by the driver.
> 

I was thinking about driver too, because device can have different interfaces to 
configure source/output, and different notifications to update status. I will 
update ptp_ocp driver to implement this logic. And it will also cover question 
of exporting these functions and their definitions.

>> +
>> int __init dpll_netlink_init(void);
>> void dpll_netlink_finish(void);
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ