netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] can: can327: remove useless header inclusions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220717235000.247bfa42.max@enpas.org>
Date:   Sun, 17 Jul 2022 23:50:00 +0200
From:   Max Staudt <max@...as.org>
To:     Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] can: can327: remove useless header inclusions

On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:02:01 +0200
Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:

> -#include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> -
> -#include <linux/bitops.h>
> -#include <linux/ctype.h>
> -#include <linux/errno.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/list.h>
> -#include <linux/lockdep.h>
> -#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> -#include <linux/skbuff.h>
> -#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> -#include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/tty.h>
> -#include <linux/tty_ldisc.h>
> -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> -
> -#include <uapi/linux/tty.h>
> -
> -#include <linux/can.h>
>  #include <linux/can/dev.h>
> -#include <linux/can/error.h>
>  #include <linux/can/rx-offload.h>

AFAIK, the coding style is to not rely on headers including other
headers. Instead, the appropriate header for every symbol used should
be included.

This is also valid for the similar patch you submitted for slcan.


Unless something has changed, this is a NAK from me, sorry.


Max