lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR07MB4080AED64AC8BFD3F9C1BE58E18D9@VI1PR07MB4080.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 17 Jul 2022 14:42:09 +0000
From:   Ferenc Fejes <ferenc.fejes@...csson.com>
To:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        "jesse.brandeburg@...el.com" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        "anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: igc: missing HW timestamps at TX

Hello!

There is a short story how did I end up here: [0]. We did a few measuerements with isochron and noticed many  issing timestamps. Running the isochron on the same CPU core as the igc PTP worker, the situation gets much better, yet we still have missing timestamp. Then as ladimir Oltean pointed out the problem is actually documented, so at high TX packet rates the HW timestamps migh be skipped. There is also a couter for that, so that something expected.


[0] https://github.com/vladimiroltean/isochron/issues/13

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ