[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR07MB4080DC45051E112EEC6D7734E18D9@VI1PR07MB4080.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 14:46:20 +0000
From: Ferenc Fejes <ferenc.fejes@...csson.com>
To: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"jesse.brandeburg@...el.com" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: igc: missing HW timestamps at TX
(Ctrl+Enter'd by mistake)
My question here: is there anything I can quickly try to avoid that behavior? Even when I send only a few (like 10) packets but on fast rate (5us between packets) I get missing TX HW timestamps. The receive side looks much more roboust, I cannot noticed missing HW timestamps there.
Thanks,
Ferenc
Powered by blists - more mailing lists