lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR07MB4080DC45051E112EEC6D7734E18D9@VI1PR07MB4080.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 17 Jul 2022 14:46:20 +0000
From:   Ferenc Fejes <ferenc.fejes@...csson.com>
To:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        "jesse.brandeburg@...el.com" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        "anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: igc: missing HW timestamps at TX

(Ctrl+Enter'd by mistake)

My question here: is there anything I can quickly try to avoid that behavior? Even when I send only a few (like 10) packets but on fast rate (5us between packets) I get missing TX HW timestamps. The receive side looks much more roboust, I cannot noticed missing HW timestamps there.

Thanks,
Ferenc

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ