[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ytl4Y61M82NOSIrW@nanopsycho>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:01:39 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
petrm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
mlxsw@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com, snelson@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 09/11] mlxsw: core_linecards: Implement line
card device flashing
Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:25:45AM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 05:12:32PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> +int mlxsw_linecard_flash_update(struct devlink *linecard_devlink,
>> + struct mlxsw_linecard *linecard,
>> + const struct firmware *firmware,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> + struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = linecard->linecards->mlxsw_core;
>> + struct mlxsw_linecard_device_fw_info info = {
>> + .mlxfw_dev = {
>> + .ops = &mlxsw_linecard_device_dev_ops,
>> + .psid = linecard->device.info.psid,
>> + .psid_size = strlen(linecard->device.info.psid),
>> + .devlink = linecard_devlink,
>> + },
>> + .mlxsw_core = mlxsw_core,
>> + .linecard = linecard,
>> + };
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&linecard->lock);
>> + if (!linecard->active) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to flash non-active linecard");
>
>IMO it's not clear enough that the problem is the fact that the line
>card is inactive. Maybe:
>
>"Only active linecards can be flashed"
Fixed.
>
>Either way:
>
>Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
>
>
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> + err = mlxsw_core_fw_flash(mlxsw_core, &info.mlxfw_dev,
>> + firmware, extack);
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&linecard->lock);
>> + return err;
>> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists