netdev - RE: [net-next PATCH 1/2] devlink: add dry run attribute to flash update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 18:49:56 +0000
From:   "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [net-next PATCH 1/2] devlink: add dry run attribute to flash
 update



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 11:49 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] devlink: add dry run attribute to flash update
> 
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 17:23:53 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > > For now maybe just fork the policies into two -
> > > with and without dry run attr. We'll improve the granularity later
> > > when doing the YAML conversion.
> >
> > Not quite sure I follow this. I guess just add a separate policy
> > array with dry_run and then make that the policy for the flash update
> > command? I don't think flash update is strict yet, and I'm not sure
> > what the impact of changing it to strict is in terms of backwards
> > compatibility with the interface.
> 
> Strictness is a separate issue, the policy split addresses just
> the support discoverability question.

Right, ok.