[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220727031524.358216-2-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:15:21 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, maximmi@...dia.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, vfedorenko@...ek.ru,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: tls: handful of memrnd() and length checks
Add a handful of memory randomizations and precise length checks.
Nothing is really broken here, I did this to increase confidence
when debugging. It does fix a GCC warning, tho. Apparently GCC
recognizes that memory needs to be initialized for send() but
does not recognize that for write().
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: shuah@...nel.org
CC: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
index 4ecbac197c46..2cbb12736596 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
@@ -644,12 +644,14 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_from_pipe2)
int p2[2];
int p[2];
+ memrnd(mem_send, sizeof(mem_send));
+
ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0);
ASSERT_GE(pipe(p2), 0);
- EXPECT_GE(write(p[1], mem_send, 8000), 0);
- EXPECT_GE(splice(p[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, 8000, 0), 0);
- EXPECT_GE(write(p2[1], mem_send + 8000, 8000), 0);
- EXPECT_GE(splice(p2[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, 8000, 0), 0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(write(p[1], mem_send, 8000), 8000);
+ EXPECT_EQ(splice(p[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, 8000, 0), 8000);
+ EXPECT_EQ(write(p2[1], mem_send + 8000, 8000), 8000);
+ EXPECT_EQ(splice(p2[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, 8000, 0), 8000);
EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, MSG_WAITALL), send_len);
EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(mem_send, mem_recv, send_len), 0);
}
@@ -683,10 +685,12 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_to_pipe)
char mem_recv[TLS_PAYLOAD_MAX_LEN];
int p[2];
+ memrnd(mem_send, sizeof(mem_send));
+
ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0);
- EXPECT_GE(send(self->fd, mem_send, send_len, 0), 0);
- EXPECT_GE(splice(self->cfd, NULL, p[1], NULL, send_len, 0), 0);
- EXPECT_GE(read(p[0], mem_recv, send_len), 0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, mem_send, send_len, 0), send_len);
+ EXPECT_EQ(splice(self->cfd, NULL, p[1], NULL, send_len, 0), send_len);
+ EXPECT_EQ(read(p[0], mem_recv, send_len), send_len);
EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(mem_send, mem_recv, send_len), 0);
}
@@ -875,6 +879,8 @@ TEST_F(tls, multiple_send_single_recv)
char recv_mem[2 * 10];
char send_mem[10];
+ memrnd(send_mem, sizeof(send_mem));
+
EXPECT_GE(send(self->fd, send_mem, send_len, 0), 0);
EXPECT_GE(send(self->fd, send_mem, send_len, 0), 0);
memset(recv_mem, 0, total_len);
@@ -891,6 +897,8 @@ TEST_F(tls, single_send_multiple_recv_non_align)
char recv_mem[recv_len * 2];
char send_mem[total_len];
+ memrnd(send_mem, sizeof(send_mem));
+
EXPECT_GE(send(self->fd, send_mem, total_len, 0), 0);
memset(recv_mem, 0, total_len);
@@ -936,10 +944,10 @@ TEST_F(tls, recv_peek)
char buf[15];
EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str, send_len, 0), send_len);
- EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len, MSG_PEEK), -1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len, MSG_PEEK), send_len);
EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str, buf, send_len), 0);
memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
- EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len, 0), -1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len, 0), send_len);
EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str, buf, send_len), 0);
}
--
2.37.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists