netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/4] tls: rx: don't consider sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220727031524.358216-3-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:15:22 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, maximmi@...dia.com,
        tariqt@...dia.com, vfedorenko@...ek.ru,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/4] tls: rx: don't consider sock_rcvtimeo() cumulative

Eric indicates that restarting rcvtimeo on every wait may be fine.
I thought that we should consider it cumulative, and made
tls_rx_reader_lock() return the remaining timeo after acquiring
the reader lock.

tls_rx_rec_wait() gets its timeout passed in by value so it
does not keep track of time previously spent.

Make the lock waiting consistent with tls_rx_rec_wait() - don't
keep track of time spent.

Read the timeo fresh in tls_rx_rec_wait().
It's unclear to me why callers are supposed to cache the value.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89iKcmSfWgvZjzNGbsrndmCch2HC_EPZ7qmGboDNaWoviNQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 0fc24a5ce208..8bac7ea2c264 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1283,11 +1283,14 @@ int tls_sw_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
 
 static int
 tls_rx_rec_wait(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool nonblock,
-		bool released, long timeo)
+		bool released)
 {
 	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
 	struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
 	DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
+	long timeo;
+
+	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, nonblock);
 
 	while (!tls_strp_msg_ready(ctx)) {
 		if (!sk_psock_queue_empty(psock))
@@ -1308,7 +1311,7 @@ tls_rx_rec_wait(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool nonblock,
 		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
 			return 0;
 
-		if (nonblock || !timeo)
+		if (!timeo)
 			return -EAGAIN;
 
 		released = true;
@@ -1842,8 +1845,8 @@ tls_read_flush_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct tls_prot_info *prot,
 	return sk_flush_backlog(sk);
 }
 
-static long tls_rx_reader_lock(struct sock *sk, struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx,
-			       bool nonblock)
+static int tls_rx_reader_lock(struct sock *sk, struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx,
+			      bool nonblock)
 {
 	long timeo;
 	int err;
@@ -1874,7 +1877,7 @@ static long tls_rx_reader_lock(struct sock *sk, struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx,
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(ctx->reader_present, 1);
 
-	return timeo;
+	return 0;
 
 err_unlock:
 	release_sock(sk);
@@ -1913,8 +1916,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 	struct tls_msg *tlm;
 	ssize_t copied = 0;
 	bool async = false;
-	int target, err = 0;
-	long timeo;
+	int target, err;
 	bool is_kvec = iov_iter_is_kvec(&msg->msg_iter);
 	bool is_peek = flags & MSG_PEEK;
 	bool released = true;
@@ -1925,9 +1927,9 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 		return sock_recv_errqueue(sk, msg, len, SOL_IP, IP_RECVERR);
 
 	psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
-	timeo = tls_rx_reader_lock(sk, ctx, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
-	if (timeo < 0)
-		return timeo;
+	err = tls_rx_reader_lock(sk, ctx, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
 	bpf_strp_enabled = sk_psock_strp_enabled(psock);
 
 	/* If crypto failed the connection is broken */
@@ -1954,8 +1956,8 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 		struct tls_decrypt_arg darg;
 		int to_decrypt, chunk;
 
-		err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, psock, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, released,
-				      timeo);
+		err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, psock, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
+				      released);
 		if (err <= 0) {
 			if (psock) {
 				chunk = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len,
@@ -2131,13 +2133,12 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 	struct tls_msg *tlm;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	ssize_t copied = 0;
-	int err = 0;
-	long timeo;
 	int chunk;
+	int err;
 
-	timeo = tls_rx_reader_lock(sk, ctx, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK);
-	if (timeo < 0)
-		return timeo;
+	err = tls_rx_reader_lock(sk, ctx, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
 
 	if (!skb_queue_empty(&ctx->rx_list)) {
 		skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list);
@@ -2145,7 +2146,7 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 		struct tls_decrypt_arg darg;
 
 		err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, NULL, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK,
-				      true, timeo);
+				      true);
 		if (err <= 0)
 			goto splice_read_end;
 
-- 
2.37.1