netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: macb: Add zynqmp SGMII dynamic configuration support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68815710-cdf2-a8b6-fc1f-5ecef6e112e8@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:57:41 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>, <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <git@....com>, <git@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: macb: Add zynqmp SGMII dynamic
 configuration support

On 29/07/2022 20:35, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
> Add support for the dynamic configuration which takes care of configuring
> the GEM secure space configuration registers using EEMI APIs. High level
> sequence is to:
> - Check for the PM dynamic configuration support, if no error proceed with
>   GEM dynamic configurations(next steps) otherwise skip the dynamic
>   configuration.
> - Configure GEM Fixed configurations.
> - Configure GEM_CLK_CTRL (gemX_sgmii_mode).
> - Trigger GEM reset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> (for MPFS)

Do you have cc suppression turned on or did this not get picked up
b/c of the (for MPFS) you added? In the future, please CC me on
later revisions if I provided a tested-by :)
Thanks,
Conor.