[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220802091110.036d40dd@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:11:10 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 1/4] net: bonding: replace dev_trans_start() with
the jiffies of the last ARP/NS
On Tue, 02 Aug 2022 11:05:19 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> In any case, this looks like a significative rework, do you mind
> consider it for the net-next, when it re-open?
It does seem like it could be a lot for stable.
Perhaps we could take:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220727152000.3616086-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
as is, without the extra work Stephen asked for (since it's gonna be
reverted in net-next, anyway)? How do you feel about that option?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists