[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yuvl9uKX8z0dh5YY@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:29:58 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Adel Abouchaev <adel.abushaev@...il.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, dsahern@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, imagedong@...cent.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] net: Documentation on QUIC kernel Tx crypto.
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:51:59AM -0700, Adel Abouchaev wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Could you add more to your comment? The /proc was used similarly to kTLS.
> Netlink is better, though, unsure how ULP stats would fit in it.
How do tools like ss(1) retrieve the protocol summary statistics? Do
they still use /proc, or netlink?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists