lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:57:58 -0700
From:   Adel Abouchaev <adel.abushaev@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, dsahern@...nel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, imagedong@...cent.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] net: Documentation on QUIC kernel Tx crypto.

Looking at 
https://github.com/shemminger/iproute2/blob/main/misc/ss.c#L589 the ss.c 
still uses proc/.

Adel.

On 8/4/22 8:29 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:51:59AM -0700, Adel Abouchaev wrote:
>> Andrew,
>>
>>     Could you add more to your comment? The /proc was used similarly to kTLS.
>> Netlink is better, though, unsure how ULP stats would fit in it.
> How do tools like ss(1) retrieve the protocol summary statistics? Do
> they still use /proc, or netlink?
>
>       Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists