[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c42bf11-8a30-3220-9d52-34b46b68888f@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:57:58 -0700
From: Adel Abouchaev <adel.abushaev@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, dsahern@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, imagedong@...cent.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] net: Documentation on QUIC kernel Tx crypto.
Looking at
https://github.com/shemminger/iproute2/blob/main/misc/ss.c#L589 the ss.c
still uses proc/.
Adel.
On 8/4/22 8:29 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:51:59AM -0700, Adel Abouchaev wrote:
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Could you add more to your comment? The /proc was used similarly to kTLS.
>> Netlink is better, though, unsure how ULP stats would fit in it.
> How do tools like ss(1) retrieve the protocol summary statistics? Do
> they still use /proc, or netlink?
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists