netdev - [syzbot] possible deadlock in p9_req

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:35:22 -0700
From:   syzbot <syzbot+50f7e8d06c3768dd97f3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     asmadeus@...ewreck.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        ericvh@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux_oss@...debyte.com, lucho@...kov.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in p9_req_put

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    ca688bff68bc Add linux-next specific files for 20220808
git tree:       linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=104c8666080000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4c20e006003cdecb
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=50f7e8d06c3768dd97f3
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+50f7e8d06c3768dd97f3@...kaller.appspotmail.com

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.19.0-next-20220808-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/0:5/3683 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888026be2c18 (&clnt->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_tag_remove net/9p/client.c:367 [inline]
ffff888026be2c18 (&clnt->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_req_put net/9p/client.c:375 [inline]
ffff888026be2c18 (&clnt->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_req_put+0xc6/0x250 net/9p/client.c:372

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888026be2c18 (&clnt->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
ffff888026be2c18 (&clnt->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_conn_cancel+0xaa/0x970 net/9p/trans_fd.c:192

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&clnt->lock);
  lock(&clnt->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by kworker/0:5/3683:
 #0: ffff888011864d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011864d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic_long_set include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011864d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:1280 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011864d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:636 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011864d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:663 [inline]
 #0: ffff888011864d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x87a/0x1610 kernel/workqueue.c:2260
 #1: ffffc90005167da8 ((work_completion)(&m->rq)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8ae/0x1610 kernel/workqueue.c:2264
 #2: ffff888026be2c18 (&clnt->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
 #2: ffff888026be2c18 (&clnt->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_conn_cancel+0xaa/0x970 net/9p/trans_fd.c:192

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 3683 Comm: kworker/0:5 Not tainted 5.19.0-next-20220808-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/22/2022
Workqueue: events p9_read_work
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2988 [inline]
 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3031 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3816 [inline]
 __lock_acquire.cold+0x116/0x3a7 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
 p9_tag_remove net/9p/client.c:367 [inline]
 p9_req_put net/9p/client.c:375 [inline]
 p9_req_put+0xc6/0x250 net/9p/client.c:372
 p9_conn_cancel+0x640/0x970 net/9p/trans_fd.c:213
 p9_read_work+0x514/0x10c0 net/9p/trans_fd.c:403
 process_one_work+0x991/0x1610 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
 worker_thread+0x665/0x1080 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
 kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.