netdev - Re: [RFC 1/1] net: move IFF_LIVE_ADDR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:36:01 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     James Prestwood <prestwoj@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] net: move IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE to public flag

On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:17:19 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> Thinking about that now, maybe it's not _that_ bad? Especially given
> that "live" can mean different things (as discussed here), and for
> wireless that doesn't necessarily mean IFF_UP, but rather something like
> "IFF_UP + not active".
> 
> Jakub, what do you think?

Agreed, even tho the concept of a live address change seems generic 
the implications and definition of "live" are very area specific.
Let's handwave that nl80211 is a subordinate API of RT netlink :)