[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220810104209.36961cc1@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:42:09 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5e: Leverage sched_numa_hop_mask()
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:57:33 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > + for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
> > + cpus[i] = cpu;
> > + if (++i == ncomp_eqs)
> > + goto spread_done;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +spread_done:
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > ret = mlx5_irqs_request_vectors(dev, cpus, ncomp_eqs, table->comp_irqs);
> > kfree(cpus);
> > if (ret < 0)
>
> This logic is typical. Other drivers would also want to use it.
> It must be introduced as a service/API function, if not by the sched
> topology, then at least by the networking subsystem.
> Jakub, WDYT?
Agreed, no preference where the helper would live tho.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists