[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbBk+komswLqs0KBg8FeFAYpC20HjXrUeZA-=7cWf6nRUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 10:49:13 +0800
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, jolsa@...nel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] bpf: Fix incorrect mem_cgroup_put
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 1:07 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:18:30PM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > The memcg may be the root_mem_cgroup, in which case we shouldn't put it.
>
> No, it is ok to put root_mem_cgroup. css_put already handles the root
> cgroups.
>
Ah, this commit log doesn't describe the issue clearly. I should improve it.
The issue is that in bpf_map_get_memcg() it doesn't get the objcg if
map->objcg is NULL (that can happen if the map belongs to the root
memcg), so we shouldn't put the objcg if map->objcg is NULL neither in
bpf_map_put_memcg().
Maybe the change below would be more reasonable ?
+static void bpf_map_put_memcg(const struct bpf_map *map, struct
mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ if (map->objcg)
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+}
--
Regards
Yafang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists