[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166015801536.14189.14692203185396182235.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:00:15 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] bpf: Introduce selectable memcg for bpf map
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:18:25 +0000 you wrote:
> On our production environment, we may load, run and pin bpf programs and
> maps in containers. For example, some of our networking bpf programs and
> maps are loaded and pinned by a process running in a container on our
> k8s environment. In this container, there're also running some other
> user applications which watch the networking configurations from remote
> servers and update them on this local host, log the error events, monitor
> the traffic, and do some other stuffs. Sometimes we may need to update
> these user applications to a new release, and in this update process we
> will destroy the old container and then start a new genration. In order not
> to interrupt the bpf programs in the update process, we will pin the bpf
> programs and maps in bpffs. That is the background and use case on our
> production environment.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,01/15] bpf: Remove unneeded memset in queue_stack_map creation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/083818156d1e
- [bpf-next,02/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_area_free instread of kvfree
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8f58ee54c2ea
- [bpf-next,03/15] bpf: Make __GFP_NOWARN consistent in bpf map creation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/992c9e13f593
- [bpf-next,04/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_area_alloc consistently on bpf map creation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/73cf09a36bf7
- [bpf-next,05/15] bpf: Fix incorrect mem_cgroup_put
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,06/15] bpf: Define bpf_map_{get,put}_memcg for !CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,07/15] bpf: Call bpf_map_init_from_attr() immediately after map creation
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,08/15] bpf: Save memcg in bpf_map_init_from_attr()
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,09/15] bpf: Use scoped-based charge in bpf_map_area_alloc
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,10/15] bpf: Introduce new helpers bpf_ringbuf_pages_{alloc,free}
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,11/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_kzalloc in arraymap
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,12/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_kvcalloc in bpf_local_storage
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,13/15] mm, memcg: Add new helper get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,14/15] bpf: Add return value for bpf_map_init_from_attr
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,15/15] bpf: Introduce selectable memcg for bpf map
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists