lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220810170706.ikyrsuzupjwt65h7@google.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:07:06 +0000 From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, songmuchun@...edance.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] bpf: Fix incorrect mem_cgroup_put On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:18:30PM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote: > The memcg may be the root_mem_cgroup, in which case we shouldn't put it. No, it is ok to put root_mem_cgroup. css_put already handles the root cgroups.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists