netdev - Re: [PATCH] net_sched: cls_route: remove from list when handle is 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <166019821453.2125.16900691983468288417.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 06:10:14 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, zplin@...orthwestern.edu, kamal@...onical.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net_sched: cls_route: remove from list when handle is 0

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Tue,  9 Aug 2022 14:05:18 -0300 you wrote:
> When a route filter is replaced and the old filter has a 0 handle, the old
> one won't be removed from the hashtable, while it will still be freed.
> 
> The test was there since before commit 1109c00547fc ("net: sched: RCU
> cls_route"), when a new filter was not allocated when there was an old one.
> The old filter was reused and the reinserting would only be necessary if an
> old filter was replaced. That was still wrong for the same case where the
> old handle was 0.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - net_sched: cls_route: remove from list when handle is 0
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/9ad36309e271

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html