lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220819170301.43675f1a@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:03:01 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthias Tafelmeier <matthias.tafelmeier@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 02/17] net: Fix data-races around weight_p and
 dev_weight_[rt]x_bias.

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:26:38 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> -	dev_rx_weight = weight_p * dev_weight_rx_bias;
> -	dev_tx_weight = weight_p * dev_weight_tx_bias;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(dev_rx_weight,
> +		   READ_ONCE(weight_p) * READ_ONCE(dev_weight_rx_bias));
> +	WRITE_ONCE(dev_tx_weight,
> +		   READ_ONCE(weight_p) * READ_ONCE(dev_weight_tx_bias));

Is there some locking on procfs writes? Otherwise one interrupted write
may get overtaken by another and we'll end up with inconsistent values.
OTOH if there is some locking we shouldn't have to protect weight_p
here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ