netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_counter: remove unneeded atomic ops for low/min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACSApvbSnCN8Fy1E3KyhkBDF=_h4vg==eoJGzM1Njf0ArX+zcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Aug 2022 20:20:14 -0400
From:   Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_counter: remove unneeded atomic ops for low/min

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 8:17 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> For cgroups using low or min protections, the function
> propagate_protected_usage() was doing an atomic xchg() operation
> irrespectively. It only needs to do that operation if the new value of
> protection is different from older one. This patch does that.
>
> To evaluate the impact of this optimization, on a 72 CPUs machine, we
> ran the following workload in a three level of cgroup hierarchy with top
> level having min and low setup appropriately. More specifically
> memory.min equal to size of netperf binary and memory.low double of
> that.
>
>  $ netserver -6
>  # 36 instances of netperf with following params
>  $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K
>
> Results (average throughput of netperf):
> Without (6.0-rc1)       10482.7 Mbps
> With patch              14542.5 Mbps (38.7% improvement)
>
> With the patch, the throughput improved by 38.7%
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>

Nice speed up!

Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>

> ---
>  mm/page_counter.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_counter.c b/mm/page_counter.c
> index eb156ff5d603..47711aa28161 100644
> --- a/mm/page_counter.c
> +++ b/mm/page_counter.c
> @@ -17,24 +17,23 @@ static void propagate_protected_usage(struct page_counter *c,
>                                       unsigned long usage)
>  {
>         unsigned long protected, old_protected;
> -       unsigned long low, min;
>         long delta;
>
>         if (!c->parent)
>                 return;
>
> -       min = READ_ONCE(c->min);
> -       if (min || atomic_long_read(&c->min_usage)) {
> -               protected = min(usage, min);
> +       protected = min(usage, READ_ONCE(c->min));
> +       old_protected = atomic_long_read(&c->min_usage);
> +       if (protected != old_protected) {
>                 old_protected = atomic_long_xchg(&c->min_usage, protected);
>                 delta = protected - old_protected;
>                 if (delta)
>                         atomic_long_add(delta, &c->parent->children_min_usage);
>         }
>
> -       low = READ_ONCE(c->low);
> -       if (low || atomic_long_read(&c->low_usage)) {
> -               protected = min(usage, low);
> +       protected = min(usage, READ_ONCE(c->low));
> +       old_protected = atomic_long_read(&c->low_usage);
> +       if (protected != old_protected) {
>                 old_protected = atomic_long_xchg(&c->low_usage, protected);
>                 delta = protected - old_protected;
>                 if (delta)
> --
> 2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog
>