netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] net: mdiobus: search for PSE nodes by parsing PHY nodes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ywd0+ncka6qYR4rW@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:11:22 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] net: mdiobus: search for PSE nodes by
 parsing PHY nodes.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:02:09PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> +static struct pse_control *
> +fwnode_find_pse_control(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> +	struct pse_control *psec;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	np = to_of_node(fwnode);
> +	if (!np)
> +		return NULL;

Doesn't to_of_node() confirm that the fwnode is a DT node? In other
words, isn't the "is_acpi_node()" entirely redundant?

> +
> +	psec = of_pse_control_get(np);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(psec))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return psec;
> +}

So fwnode_find_pse_control() returns NULL on error.

> +	psec = fwnode_find_pse_control(child);
> +	if (IS_ERR(psec))
> +		return PTR_ERR(psec);

This usage expects it to return an error-pointer.

Clearly, there is some disagreement about what fwnode_find_pse_control()
returns on error.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!